Use Nationally and in Massachusetts
The total global industrial consumption of lead in 2003 was estimated to be 15.1 billion pounds, and the U.S. consumption of lead in 2003 was estimated to be 3.06 billion pounds. The greatest use of lead is in lead-acid batteries, however lead-acid batteries are not manufactured in Massachusetts.
Lead has a low melting temperature (327° C) for a metal and is extremely malleable, which enables easy casting, shaping, and joining of lead products. Lead can be recycled as a secondary raw material from lead-acid batteries and other lead products.
The high density of lead is desirable for several product categories including weighting applications, and shielding against sound, vibration, and radiation.
Lead compounds have different physical properties than elemental lead, and are used for various products. The major lead compounds used in commerce are lead oxide (PbO), lead tetraoxide (Pb3O4), basic lead carbonate (white lead), tribasic lead sulfate, and dibasic lead phthalate.
Lead and its compounds have many desirable material properties and a variety of uses. Major products/uses of lead in the US include: batteries, ammunition, glass, heat stabilizer in plastics and resins, metal finishing, electronics (solder, board surface finish, components), sheet lead (sound barriers, roof flashing, radiation shielding), bulk metal (castings, weighting applications, ammunition), and pigments. For example, the reactions of lead oxide in dilute sulfuric acid are fundamental to the operation of a lead-acid battery.
In 2004, Massachusetts manufacturers used approximately 8.85 million pounds of lead and lead compounds.
The total U.S. consumption of lead in 2005 for various uses is shown in Table 1.
Table 2 summarizes the difference in reported use of lead in Massachusetts from 1990 to 2004. It is important to note that the reporting threshold for lead was lowered from 10,000 pounds to 100 pounds starting in 2001, so the number of facilities reporting in 2004 is significantly higher than in 1990.
Since the reporting threshold was lowered in 2001, many companies that were previously exempt entered the reporting process. For example, 59 electronics facilities, 31 metal products facilities, and 15 plastics/rubber companies entered the reporting process since 2001 due to this lower reporting threshold. In addition, concrete manufacturers and electricity generators facilities were not required to report in 1990.
The information on chemical use is based on what has been reported to the Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Program for 1990 and 2004. The numbers presented do not reflect production changes in the companies over the time period. The primary industrial sectors reporting lead use in 2004 include electricity generation, wire and cable insulation and jacketing, plastics and rubber compounding, metal products and wire and cable colorants. Electricity generators represented the largest users of lead in 2004. This industry sector was not required to report in 1990.
The percent change in lead use between 1990 and 2004 is illustrated by industry sector in Figure 1. Note that sectors reporting zero use, or not required to report, in 1990 are not included on this chart.
As shown in Figure 1, the highest percent increase (272%) in lead use in Massachusetts is associated with the paints and coatings industrial sector. However, as shown on Table 2, this industrial sector accounted for less than 2% of the total amount of lead reported in 2004. Ninety-eight percent of this industry sector’s lead usage in 2004 was reported by one traffic paint manufacturer, Franklin Paint Co. Franklin Paint did not exceed reporting threshold amounts in 1990. Traffic paint is a demanding paint application that until recently required the use of lead pigments. This Massachusetts-based traffic paint manufacturer transitioned to lead-free pigments starting in 2006, which should be reflected in the 2006 and later reports.
The Metal Products sector, which represented less than 9% of the total amount of reportable lead in Massachusetts in 2004, experienced the second highest increase (97%) in lead use. This was mainly due to 31 new facilities reporting in this sector because of the impact of the lowered reporting threshold for lead in 2000.
Of the primary industry sectors reporting us of lead in Massachusetts in 2004, the metal products industries saw an increase in reportable amounts of lead of 114%, colorants (used primarily in the wire and cable coating industry) increased by 59%, and the wire and cable jacketing and insulation industry increased by 26%. Plastics and rubber products and compounds decreased its overall reportable use of lead by 47% from 1990 to 2004.
The annual reported quantities from 1990 to 2004 in absolute amount of inputs and outputs in Massachusetts are shown in Figures 2 and 3. The term “inputs’ is the total use, consisting of amounts that are “manufactured” or “processed”, as well as amounts that are “otherwise used” (i.e., ancillary uses that do not become incorporated into the final product).
Outputs include lead and lead compounds that are “generated as byproduct” (i.e., all non-product material created by a process line prior to release, on-site treatment, or transfer) and the amount of lead and lead compounds that are “shipped in or as product." As shown in Figure 3, the majority of lead and lead compounds used are processed and subsequently shipped in product, though the trend, especially since 2000, has been towards a higher percentage of lead and lead compounds to be generated as byproduct.
As shown in Figures 2 and 3, both inputs and outputs significantly increased during the time period from 1990 to the mid 1990’s with peak values occurring in 1998. For the period 1998 to 2004, there has been a significant reduction in the Commonwealth for both inputs and outputs of lead and lead compounds. Specifically, from 1998 to 2004 the amount of lead and lead compounds “processed” was reduced by 51.3%, while the amount “shipped in or as product” over the same time period was reduced by 49.6%.
There was a major increase in lead “otherwise used” and “generated as byproduct” in 1998 because a new filer, Clean Harbors Environmental Services, was managing significant amounts of lead-bearing waste. Over the next few years, their use of lead decreased and was reclassified as “processed”.
There was also a significant increase in lead reported as “otherwise used” and “generated as byproduct” in 2003 and 2004 because Municipal Solid Waste Combustors were required to report for the first time (as “waste to energy” facilities, their use is included in “electricity generation” in Table 2).
Endnotes: European Commission Enterprise Directorate-General 2004, Final Report: Advantages and Drawbacks of Restricting the Marketing and Use of Lead in Ammunition, Fishing Sinkers and Candle Wicks; Gabby, P.N.. 2007, “Lead -- 2005” in United States Geological Survey Minerals Yearbook, available at http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/lead/leadmyb05.pdf; Graboski, D. 1998, Wire and Cable Industry, Furman Selz LLC, 230 Park Avenue, NewYork 10169; Grossman, D. 2006, Handbook of PVC Formulating, John Wiley & Sons; Linak, E. & Yagi, K. 2003, “Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Resins” in Chemical Economics Handbook SRI International; Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance (MOEA), Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance (MOEA) web site. Available: http://www.moea.state.mn.us [April, 2006]; Shedd, K.B. 2006, Mineral Industry Surveys: Tungsten in December 2005, United States Geological Survey; United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) & New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, Let’s Get the Lead Out. Available: http://wildlife.state.nh.us [2006, March 2006]; Wickson, E.J. 1993, Handbook of PVC Formulating, John Wiley & Sons.