List of Tables

Index of Topics Table 3.4.4 F: Formulation for NM-B Insulation Table 3.1.1: Lead Summary Table Table 3.2 A: Uses of Lead Table 3.2 B: Use of Lead in Massachusetts Table 3.2 C: Lead Released in Massachusetts Table 3.2 D: Stakeholder Input Table 3.4.1 A: Hardness of Ammunition Base Metals Table 3.4.1 B: Muzzle Velocity and Muzzle Energy Comparison Table 3.4.1 C: Ammunition Manufacturers Table 3.4.1 D: Ammunition for Shooting Ranges – Bismuth Table 3.4.1 E: Ammunition for Shooting Ranges – Copper Table 3.4.1 F: Ammunition for Shooting Ranges – Iron Table 3.4.1 G: Ammunition for Shooting Ranges – Tungsten Table 3.4.1 H: Ammunition for Shooting Ranges – Zinc Table 3.4.1 I: Water Quality Criteria Comparison Table 3.4.1 J: Assessment Summary – Alt. for Lead Ammunition/ Shooting Ranges Table 3.4.2 A: Hardness of Wheel Weight Materials Table 3.4.2 B: Wheel Weights – Copper Table 3.4.2 C: Wheel Weights – Steel Table 3.4.2 D: Wheel Weights – Tin Table 3.4.2 D: Wheel Weights – Zinc Table 3.4.2 E: Wheel Weight Cost Comparison Table 3.4.2 F: Manufacturers of Lead-free Wheel Weights Table 3.4.2 G: Wheel Weights – Copper Table 3.4.2 H: Wheel Weights – Steel Table 3.4.2 I: Wheel Weights – Tin Table 3.4.2 J: Wheel Weights – Zinc Table 3.4.2 K: Water Quality Criteria Table 3.4.2 L: Assessment Summary Alternatives for Lead Wheel Weights Table 3.4.3 A: Relative hardness of candidate sinker materials. Table 3.4.3 B: Fishing Sinkers – Bismuth Table 3.4.3 C: Fishing Sinkers – Ceramic Table 3.4.3 D: Fishing Sinkers – Steel Table 3.4.3 E: Fishing Sinkers – Tin Table 3.4.3 F: Fishing Sinkers – Tungsten Table 3.4.3 G: Fishing Sinkers – Bismuth Table 3.4.3 H: Fishing Sinkers – Ceramic Table 3.4.3 I: Fishing Sinkers – Steel Table 3.4.3 J: Fishing Sinkers – Tin Table 3.4.3 K: Fishing Sinkers – Tungsten Table 3.4.3 L: Water quality criteria for lead and iron Table 3.4.3 M: Assessment Summary of Alternatives for Lead Fishing Sinkers Table 3.4.4 A: Wire and Cable Performance Table 3.4.4 B: Volume of US Thermoplastic Resins in Wire and Cable - 2000 Table 3.4.4 C: U.S. Consumption of PVC Resins in Wire and Cable in 2002 Table 3.4.4 D: Various Polyvinyl Chloride Insulation Compositions (Wickson 1993) Table 3.4.4 E: Formulation for Building Wire (NNM-B) Jacket Table 3.4.4 G: Formulation for PVC Plenum Cables Table 3.4.4 H: Lead to Non-Lead Heat Stabilizer Transition (Source: AlphaGary) Table 3.4.4 I: Base Formulation Table 3.4.4 J: Lead and Non-lead Heat Stabilizer Performance Comparison Table 3.4.4 K: Lead versus Lead-free Heat Stabilizer Performance Test Table 3.4.4 L: Base Formulation Table 3.4.4 M: Testing Results Table 3.4.4 N: Testing Requirements for Various Wire and Cable Applications (OTA) Table 3.4.4 O: Mixed Metal Heat Stabilizers for PVC Wire and Cable Coatings Table 3.4.4 P: LD50 for Various Heat Stabilizer Chemicals Table 3.4.4 Q: List of Alternatives for Lead Heat Stabilizers Table 3.4.4 R: List of Mixed Metal Heat Stabilizers Table 3.4.4 S: Assessment Summary

<< Previous

1 2 3 4 5

Next >>