List of Tables
Table 6.1 D: Use of Chromium and Chromium Compounds in Massachusetts
|
| Use of Chromium and Chromium Compounds in Massachusetts (includes all species of chromium) Download PDF file (48.20 kB) |
Table 6.4.1 A: Chrome Plating Operating Conditions
|
| Chrome Plating Operating Conditions (California Department of Toxic Substances Control 1993 ) Download PDF file (46.14 kB) |
Table 6.4.1B: Advantages of Trivalent Chromium Over Hexavalent Chromium
|
| Advantages of Trivalent Chromium Over Hexavalent Chromium for Decorative Plating (Jones and Snyder 2005) Download PDF file (42.41 kB) |
Table 6.4.1C: Estimated Annual Waste Treatment/Disposal Costs
|
| Estimated Annual Waste Treatment/Disposal Costs for Hexavalent and Trivalent Plating (Snyder 1988) Download PDF file (41.96 kB) |
Table 6.4.1 D: Comparison of Hexavalent and Trivalent System Costs
|
| Comparison of Hexavalent and Trivalent System Costs (Los Angeles Board of Public Works 1996) Download PDF file (36.06 kB) |
Table 6.4.1 E: Potential Effects of Overexposure to Chemicals in Trivalent Plating Process Solutions
|
| Potential Effects of Overexposure to Chemicals in Trivalent Plating Process Solutions (Source: Cookson Electronics MSDSs) Download PDF file (47.94 kB) |
Table 6.4.1 F: Summary of Decorative Chromium Electroplating Alternatives
|
| Download PDF file (106.52 kB) |
Table 6.4.2 A: Functional Advantages and Disadvantages of Hard Chrome Electroplating
|
| Download PDF file (28.05 kB) |
Table 6.4.2 B: Advantages and Limitations of HVOF as a Hard Chromium Electroplating Alternative
|
| Advantages and Limitations of HVOF as a Hard Chromium Electroplating Alternative (Sartwell et al. 2003) Download PDF file (41.96 kB) |
|
Next >> |
