TURI » Library » Greenlist(tm) B... » Greenlist Bulle... » Greenlist(tm) Bulletin 11/11/2005  

Greenlist(tm) Bulletin 11/11/2005


This is the weekly bulletin of the TURI Library, reporting a selection of recently published titles we have acquired. Our pledge is to keep the bulletin relevant to your work and brief -- no more than 10 titles. You are welcome to send a message to jan@turi.org if you would like more information on any of the articles listed here.

Titles here, abstracts below them:
  1. Brussels Clears Deca-BDE for Use. October 2005
  2. Market Barometer: 2005 Survey of Green Building Plus Green Building in K-12 and Higher Education. 2005
  3. Product Stewardship Part 1: Adding governance to your stewardship strategy. November 2005
  4. MBDC Announces First-Ever Cradle to Cradle Environmental Certification for Six Industry Products
  5. Neuropsychological effects of chronic low-dose exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): A cross-sectional study. October 2005
  6. Environment Matters at the World Bank: Annual Review 2005

 


1. Brussels Clears Deca-BDE for Use

AUTHOR Scott, Alex

SOURCE Chemical Week, v167 n35, October 26, 2005, p16

ABSTRACT The European Commission has exempted the flame retardant decabrominated diphenyl ether (deca-BDE) from all restrictions under the commission's hazardous substances directive, allowing continued use of deca-BDE in applications including electronics. Deca-BDE had faced a ban from the end of this year, but the commission says there is "no need for measures to reduce the risks for consumers" and that the substance is exempted from any restrictions until further notice.


2. Market Barometer: 2005 Survey of Green Building Plus Green Building in K-12 and Higher Education

DATE 2005

SOURCE Turner Green Buildings

ABSTRACT K–12 school districts, colleges, and universities are increasingly interested in the benefits of Green facilities, which are designed to increase the productivity and well-being of students and teachers, lower operating costs, and reduce or eliminate negative impacts on the environment. Green facilities provide a range of significant benefits including better student performance, increased ability to attract and retain teachers, and an improved image in the community. Projects that incorporate Green features also have lower total costs over time due to reduced energy costs and more efficient operations overall. K–12 school districts and higher educational institutions are facing demands that students meet the higher standards required for the United States to remain competitive in more integrated, global markets. In 2004, $33.9 billion of educational construction projects were completed, and K–12 school districts are estimated to spend $6 billion each year on energy costs alone. With institutions working to raise educational standards in a time of budget constraints, the potential for Green facilities to boost student performance while saving money should be irresistible. But while Green educational facilities are less expensive than traditional facilities due to more efficient operations, many educational institutions don’t consider long-term project costs in their planning at all. And even for institutions that do, most still give the greatest emphasis to initial project costs, often forgoing the cost savings and educational benefits that Green construction provides. These are the most important findings of the 2005 Green Building Market Barometer. This is the second year that the Turner Construction Company has conducted a broad assessment of the views of senior executives on Green buildings. The 2005 Market Barometer surveyed 665 senior executives, with a special focus on Green building issues in educational facilities. In addition, the views of executives from organizations working with a wide variety of different types of facilities were solicited on the benefits and costs of Green construction.


3. Product Stewardship Part 1: Adding governance to your stewardship strategy

AUTHOR MacLean, Richard

SOURCE Environmental Protection, v16 n9, November/December 2005

ABSTRACT The following is the first part in a two-part series that examines the subject of product stewardship. This issue is taking on a whole new significance in light of emerging global regulations based on the precautionary principle and management's push to develop new products in expanded markets. What are the dynamics in play and what strategies are appropriate for a global marketplace? While there is no generally accepted definition for product stewardship, a common theme runs through most descriptions of this concept: whoever designs, produces, sells, or uses a product has a shared responsibility for minimizing the product's harmful impacts throughout all stages of its life-cycle. Implicit in this concept is that stakeholders along the life-cycle have a voice, and that the greatest responsibility lies with whoever has the best ability to affect possible harmful impacts of the product. The unfortunate real world application of the latter point is that any individual or group can sue the company with the deepest pockets along the product's life-cycle. That view may reflect the most extreme cynicism, but there is also a very real and legitimate matter of business ethics involved with product stewardship. Even if a company is shielded by regulations or case law, there remain fundamental business questions of what is fair, sensible, and consistent with company values and culture. Most definitions narrowly focus on environmental concerns, but safety and health issues should be fair game in a robust product stewardship strategy, especially if there are concerns that fall outside the domain of government product safety regulations [e.g., the Federal Drug Administration (FDA), the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) in the United States]. Indeed, these "unregulated areas" can cause the greatest concern because companies may not assign clear lines of responsibility and/or oversight is split among groups that may rarely communicate with one another. In addition, services should be included since these can also have significant environmental, health, and safety impacts.


4. MBDC Announces First-Ever Cradle to Cradle Environmental Certification for Six Industry Products

SOURCE McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry (MBDC)

DATE 2005

ABSTRACT McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry (MBDC) has announced six products as the first to qualify for Cradle to Cradle™ certification. MBDC's new program evaluates and certifies the quality of products based on Cradle to Cradle™ Design principles by measuring their positive effects upon the environment, human health and social equity. Named as the first products to qualify under the rigorous evaluation system, are:

> Athletic Polymer Systems, Inc. Tartan® Track

> Haworth, Inc. Zody™ Chair

> Hycrete Technologies, LLC Hycrete® Concrete Additive

> Pendleton® Woolen Mills Classic Wool Flannel

> Steelcase, Inc. Think™ Chair

> Victor Innovatex, Inc. Eco Intelligent Polyester®

 MBDC's Cradle to Cradle™ certification process examines products at many levels to ensure they meet key standards for ecologically-effective design. Basic certification levels include Biological Nutrient or Technical Nutrient -- both of which are evaluated in terms of human and ecological health, intended for simple products -- and Platinum, Gold or Silver which are evaluated to meet additional standards including energy, water and social criteria. The strict MBDC certification processes provide corporations proof and validation of their products' quality, performance, and ecological intelligence, all of which are designed to enhance a product's market value.


5. Neuropsychological effects of chronic low-dose exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): A cross-sectional study

AUTHOR Peper, Martin; Klett, Martin; Morgenstern, Rudolph

SOURCE Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 2005, 4:22

ABSTRACT Background: Exposure to indoor air of private or public buildings contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) has raised health concerns in long-term users. This exploratory neuropsychological group study investigated the potential adverse effects of chronic low-dose exposure to specific air-borne low chlorinated PCBs on well-being and behavioral measures in adult humans. Methods: Thirty employees exposed to indoor air contaminated with PCBs from elastic sealants in a school building were compared to 30 non-exposed controls matched for education and age, controlling for gender (age range 37–61 years). PCB exposure was verified by external exposure data and biological monitoring (PCB 28, 101, 138, 153, 180). Subjective complaints, learning and memory, executive function, and visual-spatial function was assessed by standardized neuropsychological testing. Since exposure status depended on the use of contaminated rooms, an objectively exposed subgroup (N = 16; PCB 28 = 0.20 µg/l; weighted exposure duration 17.9 ± 7 years) was identified and compared with 16 paired controls. Results: Blood analyses indicated a moderate exposure effect size (d) relative to expected background exposure for total PCB (4.45 ± 2.44 µg/l; d = 0.4). A significant exposure effect was found for the low chlorinated PCBs 28 (0.28 ± 0.25 µg/l; d = 1.5) and 101 (0.07 ± 0.09 µg/l; d => 0.7). Although no neuropsychological effects exceeded the adjusted significance level, estimation statistics showed elevated effect sizes for several variables. The objectively exposed subgroup showed a trend towards increased subjective attentional and emotional complaints (tiredness and slowing of practical activities, emotional state) as well as attenuated attentional performance (response shifting and alertness in a cued reaction task). Conclusion: Chronic inhalation of low chlorinated PCBs that involved elevated blood levels was associated with a subtle attenuation of emotional well-being and attentional function. Extended research is needed to replicate the potential long-term low PCB effects in a larger sample.


6. Environment Matters at the World Bank: Annual Review 2005

SOURCE World Bank

DATE 2005

ABSTRACT In line with one of the major themes in the World Bank’s Environment Strategy, this year’s edition is devoted to the theme of environmental health. We also provide a broader, annual review of the past fiscal year from an environmental perspective, captured most directly in the Director’s Overview and supported by regional contributions in the latter part of this edition. Viewpoint articles in this edition reflect several external perspectives. WHO lays out the panorama of environmental risk factors; a successful example of combating urban air pollution is provided by the former mayor of Bogotá; successful strategies to enhance sanitation among poor people are suggested by an NGO (WaterAid) with an impressive implementation record; and a leading researcher gives his perspective on indoor air pollution. As usual, Environment Matters provides a Bank-wide review of our safeguard policies and conveys the latest data on our environmental lending and analytical work. This year’s feature articles all cluster around the main theme of environmental health: Ruta and Sarraf explain the basics of economic valuation of health impacts of environmental risks; Kaufmann summarizes a recent study that provides an overview of what we know about the effectiveness of interventions in water & sanitation; Ahmed and Awe return to the theme of indoor air pollution with a study from Guatemala; Constant and Procee explain how the Bank’s Clean Air Initiative works in several regions; and Tynan concludes the section with an article on the risks that chemicals pose to human health. A major part of this edition—as in the past—consists of reviews of each of the Bank’s Regions. With attention to the environmental health theme, each Region has chosen a number of issues and projects to feature in their annual review. This section provides ample illustration of the diversity of issues that the Bank is confronting in collaboration with client countries. The regional reviews are complemented by the institutional perspectives of the International Finance Corporation, which deals with private sector development, and the World Bank Institute, which is responsible for capacity building in client countries. The Bank’s Development Marketplace focused on environment this year, and two winning projects are presented in this edition. New environmental publications from the World Bank are also presented on the back cover.

 

You are welcome to send a message to jan@turi.org if you would like more information on any of these resources. Also, please tell us what topics you are particularly interested in monitoring, and who else should see GREENLIST. An online search of the TURI Library catalog can be done at http://greenlist.turi.org/ for greater topic coverage.

COPYRIGHT © 2005 by the TURI Library University of Massachusetts Lowell



This page updated Friday November 09 2007